Environment . Climate Change . Alternative Energy . Waste Management 
   

         

HOME          Climate Change         Energy Sources           News            Jobs         Contracts   

 



Read up to date

news on:

 

Renewable Energy 

Climate Change 

Weather

Environmental Pollution

Earthquakes & storms

 

 

You can also visit:

Current News Page

 

            OR

 

The Archived News

 

 

Hillary Clinton on Environment and Energy

Since joining the Senate, I have proudly served on the Environment and Public Works Committee, where I have fought to clean up the air that New Yorkers breathe, protect the water they drink, and revitalize contaminated sites in their communities. I have also worked to protect the natural treasures that New Yorkers enjoy, from the waters of Long Island Sound to the Adirondack Mountains, to the Great Lakes. I strongly believe that it is our duty to be better stewards of our environment—for the sake of our own health and the natural legacy that we will pass along to future generations.

 



Hillary Clinton, US Democratic Party Nominee Hopeful and her family
   

 


I have also worked to advance a balanced energy policy that will increase our energy independence, create jobs, and provide cleaner, more reliable energy. I support policies to diversify our energy supplies by investing in renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar, developing advanced energy technologies such as clean coal and hydrogen fuel cells, and promoting environmentally responsible recovery of oil and gas resources. We also need to take steps to use energy more efficiently, in our cars, homes, and offices. Taken together, these steps will help to reduce the high energy prices facing New Yorkers and the rest of the country and move us away from dependence on foreign energy sources.

 

Clean Air


While we have made major strides in reducing air pollution over the last three decades, much work remains to be done. Recent medical evidence strongly links air pollution to increased incidence of asthma attacks, heart attacks, cardiopulmonary disease, cancer, and premature death. The most vulnerable among us—children, the elderly, and those with existing respiratory problems—are most susceptible to air pollution. That is why I believe it is more important than ever that we reduce harmful air pollution and ensure that all New Yorkers have clean, safe air to breathe.

To reduce air pollution from power plants—one of the largest sources of air pollution—I am a cosponsor of The Clean Power Act. This bipartisan bill would require power plants to significantly reduce harmful emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon dioxide – emissions that contribute to poor air quality, smog, acid rain, global warming, and contamination of fish.

 

Environmental Health


We are exposed to literally thousands of chemicals in our daily lives. Scientific research has confirmed links between pollutants such as lead, mercury, PCBs and a wide range of health problems. But many of the links between chemical exposure and disease remain unexplored and poorly understood.

In order to improve our understanding so we can prevent diseases caused by environmental factors, I have introduced the Coordinated Environmental Public Health Network Act. This bill would expand on bio-monitoring work already underway to determine which chemicals are accumulating in our bodies. It would also create a network that would link disease registries, which contain information about the incidence of chronic diseases, to databases containing information about pollution.

 

Climate Change


The scientific consensus on climate change is increasingly clear: unless we act to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, the planet will continue to warm over the next century, with widespread and potentially devastating effects. These potential effects include more frequent extreme weather events, and the wider spread of diseases such as West Nile, Eastern Equine Encephalitis, and malaria.

Potential impacts in New York include coastal flooding due to rising sea levels in communities on Long Island, warming in the Adirondacks, where tourism and a way of life depend on cold and snow in the winter, and damage to New York’s agriculture industry.

Given the scientific evidence that we have and the potential consequences of continued warming, I strongly believe this nation needs to take sensible first steps to slow and ultimately reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases that contribute to climate change. To that end, I support investment in renewable energy, carbon sequestration, and the flexible, market-based emissions reduction approach in the Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 proposed by Senators Lieberman and McCain. I also support funding for research and development of carbon sequestration technologies as well as advanced clean coal technologies.

 

Clean Water


New York is home to some of the most spectacular waterways in the nation, which provide endless recreational, environmental, tourism, and other economic opportunities. In the 109th Congress, I became the senior Democrat on the Fisheries, Wildlife and Water subcommittee of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. As ranking member, I will continue to work to improve our efforts to protect New York’s water. In 2004, I secured Senate passage of a bill to fund watershed protection measures to protect New York City’s water supplies. In addition, I helped to pass through the Senate two other important water resource bills: the Great Lakes Legacy Act and the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Lake Champlain Basin Act. I am currently working to pass legislation to protect Long Island Sound from dumping contaminated materials, and to provide funding for watershed protection efforts in the Finger Lakes.

 

Cleaning Up Toxic Waste


In 1978, the tragic consequences of the dumping of toxic wastes burst onto the national consciousness with the discovery that residents of Love Canal, NY were being exposed to hazardous chemicals buried underneath their homes by the Hooker Chemical Company. In large part, the Love Canal crisis led to the passage in 1980 of the federal Superfund law. Although the Love Canal cleanup was recently completed, many sites remain to be cleaned up under the federal Superfund program. However, the pace of cleanups has slowed during the Bush Administration because they have allowed the polluter-pays tax on oil and chemical producers to lapse. I have cosponsored legislation that would replenish the trust fund so we can clean up abandoned Superfund sites in New York as soon as possible.

I have also worked to promote the cleanup and redevelopment of less-contaminated sites known as brownfields. These sites sit idle in many communities because of concerns about the cost and potential liability associated with cleaning them up. Cleaning up these sites and redeveloping them is good for the environment and the economy. To spur brownfields redevelopment, I cosponsored and helped to pass the Brownfields Revitalization and Environmental Restoration Act of 2001. This important legislation provides grant funding to assess contamination at brownfields sites and to clean them up.

 

Protecting America’s Natural Heritage


Protecting America’s vast environmental treasures, such as our National Parks, National Forests, and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, is a bipartisan tradition stretching back to Teddy Roosevelt. These special places are part of our natural – and our national – heritage.

I have strongly supported protection of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Arctic Refuge is part of what makes our country unique, beautiful and precious. During my time in the Senate, I have worked to ensure that the Arctic Refuge will not be opened to unnecessary development. I am an original cosponsor of legislation that would protect the refuge by designating it as a protected wilderness area.   In addition, I have voted against opening the refuge to drilling at every opportunity during my time in the Senate. Drilling for oil in the Arctic Refuge is bad environmental policy, and it is bad energy policy.  It would take ten years of drilling in the Arctic Refuge to produce oil. We do not need to despoil an environmental treasure on a gamble for oil where the odds of finding significant supplies are remote.  We instead need to provide the appropriate incentives for the development and use of energy efficient products, alternative and renewable fuels, and improved conservation measures.

I believe we need a balanced approach to managing our 191 million acres of national forests. Our national forests belong to all Americans, and can produce timber, provide opportunities for hiking, fishing, hunting, protect our water supplies and provide habitat for wildlife. I believe that a key component of a balanced management approach is to preserve our remaining pristine national forest areas. These areas are national treasures that should be preserved and passed on to future generations. That is why I have supported protections for pristine national forests by co-sponoring the Roadless Area Conservation Act. This important legislation prohibits road construction and logging in unspoiled, roadless areas of the National Forest System.

 

Energy


I firmly believe that a strong, balanced national energy policy is a key to strong economic and environmental policies as well. We need a policy that promotes the use of energy efficient technologies and alternative and renewable sources and increases energy production without disturbing precious natural resources, such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Our energy policy must also improve the reliability of our electricity transmission grid, protect the public's health from harmful air emissions, and create jobs.

That’s why I have proposed a "Strategic Energy Fund" to jumpstart our transition to clean energy sources. It’s a $50 billion "Apollo Project" for energy. The bill eliminates oil company tax breaks and ensures that they pay their fair share of royalties for drilling on public lands. It also gives oil companies a choice: invest in alternative energy technologies or pay a temporary fee into the fund. The Strategic Energy Fund would raise $50 billion to fund research, development and deployment of energy technologies that will reduce America's oil dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. The Strategic Energy Fund will:

  • Deliver Clean Coal Technology. $3.5 billion in tax incentives and grants to build 5 clean coal plants that can capture and store carbon dioxide and reduce global warming.

  • Invest in Renewable Energy. Move America towards the goal of producing 25 percent of electricity from renewable sources by extending the production tax credit for generating electricity from wind and other renewable sources for five years.

  • Transform America's Vehicles. Put more efficient vehicles on the road by quadrupling consumer tax breaks for hybrids, clean diesel, and other advanced vehicles, creating incentives for auto manufacturers to retool their facilities, and putting $500 million towards advanced battery research to speed development of "plug-in" hybrid vehicles.

  • Accelerate Homegrown Biofuels. Extend the ethanol tax credit until 2012, and speed the development of cellulosic ethanol by providing loan guarantees for the first billion gallons of commercial production capacity, and providing $2 billion for research.

  • Improve Efficiency. Increase incentives to make homes and offices more comfortable and cheaper to operate by improving energy efficiency.

  • Unleash American Ingenuity. Accelerate energy research by creating a $9 billion "Advanced Research Projects Agency" for energy.

Other information relating to Clinton and Environment go to: http://www.senate.gov/~clinton/issues/environment/

 

Download the PDF of Clinton's Plans:

Source: Hillary Clinton for President's website

 

Check other Presidential hopefuls' energy plans:

      Barack Obama's Energy Plan

      John McCain's Energy Plan

 

 

Return to:  Environmental News Page

 


©   2007 Environmental Business